<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ConvolutedTheory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.convolutedtheory.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.convolutedtheory.com</link>
	<description>Nerdy. Deal with it. Or go away.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My new storage dilemma, resolved. by Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.convolutedtheory.com/tech/my-new-storage-dilemma-resolved/comment-page-1/#comment-468</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convolutedtheory.com/?p=210#comment-468</guid>
		<description>Nice article Derek - I hadn&#039;t heard of OpenIndiana, but if it&#039;s anything like it&#039;s cousin Indiana Jones, it should be a cunning and flexible OS :)

Otherwise, I have used Dropbox on my Linux machines for quite awhile, but I will give Spideroak a whirl and see what it&#039;s all about.

apt-cache search dropbox
mint-dropbox - Dropbox integration for Linux Mint
nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox integration for Nautilus

Ttyl!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article Derek &#8211; I hadn&#8217;t heard of OpenIndiana, but if it&#8217;s anything like it&#8217;s cousin Indiana Jones, it should be a cunning and flexible OS <img src='http://www.convolutedtheory.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Otherwise, I have used Dropbox on my Linux machines for quite awhile, but I will give Spideroak a whirl and see what it&#8217;s all about.</p>
<p>apt-cache search dropbox<br />
mint-dropbox &#8211; Dropbox integration for Linux Mint<br />
nautilus-dropbox &#8211; Dropbox integration for Nautilus</p>
<p>Ttyl!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linux tip of the day: Super fast SCP file copies. by saad</title>
		<link>http://www.convolutedtheory.com/tech/linux/linux-tip-day-super-fast-scp-file-copies/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>saad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 04:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convolutedtheory.com/?p=60#comment-389</guid>
		<description>thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linux tip of the day: Super fast SCP file copies. by Mediocre-Ninja.blogSpot.com</title>
		<link>http://www.convolutedtheory.com/tech/linux/linux-tip-day-super-fast-scp-file-copies/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Mediocre-Ninja.blogSpot.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convolutedtheory.com/?p=60#comment-322</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried SSH with &quot;-c arcfour&quot; and it showed a significant improvement, but adding &quot;-C&quot; didn&#039;t help, if not to say it slowed down. Manpage says -C can improve the performance, but from my tests I think it can be a burden if the CPU/network is not balance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried SSH with &#8220;-c arcfour&#8221; and it showed a significant improvement, but adding &#8220;-C&#8221; didn&#8217;t help, if not to say it slowed down. Manpage says -C can improve the performance, but from my tests I think it can be a burden if the CPU/network is not balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on mod_security and Drupal 6.2 issues. by Jake Schlachter</title>
		<link>http://www.convolutedtheory.com/tech/mod_security-and-drupal-62-issues/comment-page-1/#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Schlachter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 12:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convolutedtheory.com/?p=15#comment-317</guid>
		<description>After doing an hour of web research on this, here&#039;s what I think is going on.  

mod_security on Dreamhost (and possibly other hosting providers) ships with default rules that will intermittently bite Drupal users.  Each of these rules is just a regex match on text in a node, or the URL being requested.  The rule is triggered intermittently - a reload usually solves the problem (and fails to trigger the rule).

The &quot;page&quot; that is &quot;not found&quot; is not actually the page the user is looking for. It&#039;s internal_error.html that is to be served when PHP dies prematurely, on account of being blocked by mod_security for this request.  Creating the internal_error.html file in the Drupal root should fix that problem.

You can add the rules above to your .htaccess file for your site, if you don&#039;t have root permissions on your server.  Instead of using LocationMatch, which is not valid for .htaccess, use this instead:


SecRuleRemoveById 960010
SecRuleRemoveById 960015
SecRuleRemoveById 960032
SecRuleRemoveById 950107


Hope that helps.  I have just made the change on my web server, and am waiting to see if any additional mod_security errors will be generated.  (They look like &quot;Premature end of script headers&quot; in the httpd error.log)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After doing an hour of web research on this, here&#8217;s what I think is going on.  </p>
<p>mod_security on Dreamhost (and possibly other hosting providers) ships with default rules that will intermittently bite Drupal users.  Each of these rules is just a regex match on text in a node, or the URL being requested.  The rule is triggered intermittently &#8211; a reload usually solves the problem (and fails to trigger the rule).</p>
<p>The &#8220;page&#8221; that is &#8220;not found&#8221; is not actually the page the user is looking for. It&#8217;s internal_error.html that is to be served when PHP dies prematurely, on account of being blocked by mod_security for this request.  Creating the internal_error.html file in the Drupal root should fix that problem.</p>
<p>You can add the rules above to your .htaccess file for your site, if you don&#8217;t have root permissions on your server.  Instead of using LocationMatch, which is not valid for .htaccess, use this instead:</p>
<p>SecRuleRemoveById 960010<br />
SecRuleRemoveById 960015<br />
SecRuleRemoveById 960032<br />
SecRuleRemoveById 950107</p>
<p>Hope that helps.  I have just made the change on my web server, and am waiting to see if any additional mod_security errors will be generated.  (They look like &#8220;Premature end of script headers&#8221; in the httpd error.log)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linux tip of the day: Super fast SCP file copies. by Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.convolutedtheory.com/tech/linux/linux-tip-day-super-fast-scp-file-copies/comment-page-1/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 00:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convolutedtheory.com/?p=60#comment-311</guid>
		<description>First off, don&#039;t be a jerk. If your mileage varies from the posted, then you probably are running on crappy hardware/network/something or you&#039;ve got sunspots/earthquakes/emf/stupidity. The following is verified by neuhalfen.name. It&#039;s down at the moment, but google cache is here: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:_4zYEhpHEW4J:www.neuhalfen.name/2009/02/04/scp_performance_gain_by_using_right_algorithm/+openssh+scp+arcfour+vs+blowfish&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;gl=us&amp;strip=1

-- Begin shamelessly copied from googlecache content --
&quot;No explicit cipher (aes128-cb)

Merkur:jens jens$ scp jens@helios:/export/home/jens/XXXXX /dev/null
XXXXX    6%  143MB  23.7MB/s   01:22 ETA^CKilled by signal 2.

This is the default behaviour on my machines. Other setups might choose a different default algorithm. According to the OpenSSH homepage the list of availabe candidates is (cited from the man page):

    Ciphers
    Specifies the ciphers allowed for protocol version 2 in order of
    preference. Multiple ciphers must be comma-separated. The default is
    “aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,
    aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc”

Using 3des

I expected 3des to be quite slow, and I wasn’t disappointed:

Merkur:~ jens$ scp -c 3des jens@helios:/export/home/jens/XXXXX /dev/null
XXXXX    3%   82MB  11.7MB/s   02:51 ETA^CKilled by signal 2.

As expected, 3des will not be our performance king today.
Using Blowfish

The next candidate was Blowfish. I expected at least aes performance from it. Let’s see, how it worked out:

Merkur:jens jens$ scp -c blowfish jens@helios:/export/home/jens/XXXXX /dev/null
XXXXX    29%  615MB  36.0MB/s   00:40 ETA^CKilled by signal 2.

Final candidate: RC4

The final candidate is the only stream cipher in the suit: arcfour.

Merkur:~ jens$ scp   -c arcfour jens@helios:/export/home/jens/XXXXX /dev/null
XXXXX    9%  202MB  51.7MB/s   00:36 ETA^Killed by signal 2.

Conclusion

Speedwise arcfour wins hands down. I did not expect a more than doubled performance over the default aes128-cbc. Who would have thought that switching the algorithm makes that much of a difference.&quot;
-- End googlecache content --

The default cipher after OpenSSH v4.7 is blowfish, which as you can see is slower than arcfour. Sadly, I am right, and you still have crappy hardware. I will note however that arcfour is MUCH less secure, but if you&#039;re looking for speed it cant be beat. Except by http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/theory.php .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, don&#8217;t be a jerk. If your mileage varies from the posted, then you probably are running on crappy hardware/network/something or you&#8217;ve got sunspots/earthquakes/emf/stupidity. The following is verified by neuhalfen.name. It&#8217;s down at the moment, but google cache is here: <a href="http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:_4zYEhpHEW4J:www.neuhalfen.name/2009/02/04/scp_performance_gain_by_using_right_algorithm/+openssh+scp+arcfour+vs+blowfish&#038;hl=en&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;gl=us&#038;strip=1" rel="nofollow">http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:_4zYEhpHEW4J:www.neuhalfen.name/2009/02/04/scp_performance_gain_by_using_right_algorithm/+openssh+scp+arcfour+vs+blowfish&#038;hl=en&#038;client=firefox-a&#038;gl=us&#038;strip=1</a></p>
<p>&#8211; Begin shamelessly copied from googlecache content &#8211;<br />
&#8220;No explicit cipher (aes128-cb)</p>
<p>Merkur:jens jens$ scp jens@helios:/export/home/jens/XXXXX /dev/null<br />
XXXXX    6%  143MB  23.7MB/s   01:22 ETA^CKilled by signal 2.</p>
<p>This is the default behaviour on my machines. Other setups might choose a different default algorithm. According to the OpenSSH homepage the list of availabe candidates is (cited from the man page):</p>
<p>    Ciphers<br />
    Specifies the ciphers allowed for protocol version 2 in order of<br />
    preference. Multiple ciphers must be comma-separated. The default is<br />
    “aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,<br />
    aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc”</p>
<p>Using 3des</p>
<p>I expected 3des to be quite slow, and I wasn’t disappointed:</p>
<p>Merkur:~ jens$ scp -c 3des jens@helios:/export/home/jens/XXXXX /dev/null<br />
XXXXX    3%   82MB  11.7MB/s   02:51 ETA^CKilled by signal 2.</p>
<p>As expected, 3des will not be our performance king today.<br />
Using Blowfish</p>
<p>The next candidate was Blowfish. I expected at least aes performance from it. Let’s see, how it worked out:</p>
<p>Merkur:jens jens$ scp -c blowfish jens@helios:/export/home/jens/XXXXX /dev/null<br />
XXXXX    29%  615MB  36.0MB/s   00:40 ETA^CKilled by signal 2.</p>
<p>Final candidate: RC4</p>
<p>The final candidate is the only stream cipher in the suit: arcfour.</p>
<p>Merkur:~ jens$ scp   -c arcfour jens@helios:/export/home/jens/XXXXX /dev/null<br />
XXXXX    9%  202MB  51.7MB/s   00:36 ETA^Killed by signal 2.</p>
<p>Conclusion</p>
<p>Speedwise arcfour wins hands down. I did not expect a more than doubled performance over the default aes128-cbc. Who would have thought that switching the algorithm makes that much of a difference.&#8221;<br />
&#8211; End googlecache content &#8211;</p>
<p>The default cipher after OpenSSH v4.7 is blowfish, which as you can see is slower than arcfour. Sadly, I am right, and you still have crappy hardware. I will note however that arcfour is MUCH less secure, but if you&#8217;re looking for speed it cant be beat. Except by <a href="http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/theory.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/theory.php</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Linux tip of the day: Super fast SCP file copies. by Anwar</title>
		<link>http://www.convolutedtheory.com/tech/linux/linux-tip-day-super-fast-scp-file-copies/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Anwar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 23:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convolutedtheory.com/?p=60#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Fuck you..is this a tip
this is 10 time slower than simple scp without any option</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck you..is this a tip<br />
this is 10 time slower than simple scp without any option</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What happened to BlueBear? by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.convolutedtheory.com/tech/happened-bluebear/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convolutedtheory.com/?p=169#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Maybe send him a DM on twitter....that may get his attention :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe send him a DM on twitter&#8230;.that may get his attention <img src='http://www.convolutedtheory.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NetXfer on Linux HOWTO by inetd super server</title>
		<link>http://www.convolutedtheory.com/netxfer-linux-howto/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>inetd super server</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convolutedtheory.com/?page_id=30#comment-220</guid>
		<description>[...] enforcement agency, had his IT staff halved just before a new security-conscious administration cameNetXfer on Linux HOWTO ConvolutedTheoryFirst, we need to install dhcpd and tftpd (and inetd if you&#039;ve uninstalled it) ... Okay, now on to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] enforcement agency, had his IT staff halved just before a new security-conscious administration cameNetXfer on Linux HOWTO ConvolutedTheoryFirst, we need to install dhcpd and tftpd (and inetd if you&#39;ve uninstalled it) &#8230; Okay, now on to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reasons *I* love (and hate) gentoo (v2.0) by Reasons to love (and hate) gentoo. &#124; Just linux！</title>
		<link>http://www.convolutedtheory.com/general/reasons-love-hate-gentoo/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>Reasons to love (and hate) gentoo. &#124; Just linux！</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convolutedtheory.com/?p=159#comment-213</guid>
		<description>[...] View original post here:  Reasons to love (and hate) gentoo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] View original post here:  Reasons to love (and hate) gentoo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reasons *I* love (and hate) gentoo (v2.0) by Links 14/3/2010: A Lot More Android in Devices, Dell Tablets &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://www.convolutedtheory.com/general/reasons-love-hate-gentoo/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 14/3/2010: A Lot More Android in Devices, Dell Tablets &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 14:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.convolutedtheory.com/?p=159#comment-212</guid>
		<description>[...] Reasons to love (and hate) gentoo. Some reasons I love the Gentoo Linux Distribution: * Fast. Wow is it fast. * Packages are up to date. * FreeBSD-ish ports system. Compile everything from scratch. * Awesome for home uses and personal stuff. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reasons to love (and hate) gentoo. Some reasons I love the Gentoo Linux Distribution: * Fast. Wow is it fast. * Packages are up to date. * FreeBSD-ish ports system. Compile everything from scratch. * Awesome for home uses and personal stuff. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

